Causes and Impact of Health Inequalities

Causes and Impact of wellness In likenitiesBackgroundIn todays homo, the advancements in medical technology and its expansion view improve the everyplace all told wellness of the population. However, inequalities persist within wellness cargon and non all passel defend equal access to it. Why do these disparities still represent in the present day? Understanding why these inequalities exist patronage modern advancements has a signifi senst importance in reducing health c are inequalities.AimUnderstanding health plow inequalities and its challenges are the puzzle of this assignment. It seeks to explain and understand the mechanisms underlying the associations that s crystalise be found amid the socio-economic statuses of population groups and their quality of health. It as well as explores life course pathways which mould and run a persons be incidents of having a healthy life along with advantages and disadvantages that give notice print health from an earl y age into adulthood. In addition, other factors much(prenominal) as gender, mental illness and disability and ethnicity entrust alike be discussed since they also have a major contri only whenion to inequalities in health. The assignment result focus on look into led in the United country (UK).The United Kingdoms long tradition of research on health inequalitiesThe UK is a high-income society, where greater prosperity and better overall health have been successfully attained without narrowing health inequalities, it can therefore be interpreted as an example for other societies that manifest similar trends in inequalities (Graham, 2009). health InequalitiesHealth inequalities are differences amongst people or groups due to favorable, geographical, biologic or other factors. These differences have a huge relate, because they result in people who are worst off experiencing wretcheder health and shorter lives (NICE, 2012).Affordable health wangleDuring the 19th centur y, in equivalence in health was intimatelyly due to factors much(prenominal) as overcrowding, insufficient availability to local give-and-take facilities and poor sanitation (Morning 2015). Nowadays, in our industrialized society, these disadvantages have essentially disappeared. Modern hospitals and treatment centres are now commonly accessible crossways the UK. But not everyone can afford treatment.A study led in 2004 has shown that riches is correlated with longevity, which demonstrates a strong link between the socio-economic status and mortality. For example, mother wind 1 exhibits a pattern of health across income groups in England in 2004. As seen below, the proportion of men and women who deem their health as not good increases from around 15 percent in the richest fifth of incline households to around 40 percent in the poorest fifth of households. This significant elevation is not only manifested in the majority white population merely also in other ethnicities i n the UK (Graham, 2009). general anatomy 1 dimension of women and men aged 16 and over assessing their health as not good by income quintile base on equivalized household income, England 2003. (Graham, 2009)This can be explained by considering the advantages that people in the higher socio-economic groups have. These advantages can lead to more knowledge about their health and the sell available through improved education, or better continuity of manage without issues of complying with treatment regiments much(prenominal) as expensive medication. For example, a man with higher income and education levels get out have improved health insurance, increase training about the availability of treatments and will more frequently visit the doctor. This can translate into receiving more screenings such as screenings for colorectal cancer and diabetes.Differences between mixer classes and how they affect health Landmark studies such as the Black report have shown that not only do h earty class inequalities still exist, they are also widening over time (DHHS,1980). affectionate class inequalities have been discover in all ages for all the major diseases. To try and describe sociable class inequalities in health, various models have been introduced into the UK such as the behavioral/cultural model, the materialist model, the psycho-social model and the life-course model (Steinbach,2009 Bartley and Blane, 2008 Bartley, 2004 DHHS, 1980).These models differentiate the characteristics affecting health that can be observed in different social classes over the total period of their lives.For example, by describing the differences in behaviour that distinct social classes have, i.e. the behavioural model. Such as their dietary choices between healthy and unhealthy food, their preponderance to being in contact with drugs, alcohol and tobacco or the mark to pursuing active leisure time such as hobbies in addition to their approach to healthy life choices such as imm unisation, contraceptive method and antenatal services (Steinbach 2009 Bartley, 2004 DHHS, 1980).Another model is the materialist model which describes the differences between social classes to the exposure to health hazards. This encompasses hazards such as air pollution, mold, cold, infestations and respiratory hazards that can sneak from bad housing for example. The Black report (DHHS,1980) claims that this model is the most decisive factor leading to health inequalities. But many experts delimit that since, in the UK, somewhat disadvantaged people receive various kinds of sound out aids, therefore it can be argued that housing and other materialistic issues are insufficient to account for major inequalities in health outcomes (Steinbach, 2009 Barley, 2004, DHHS, 1980).The psycho-social model on the other hand describes the principle that what people feel can check into changes in the physiology of the body. For example, a stressful social environment produces an emotional c hemical reaction which alters the state of the body through biologic changes and can lead to sober conditions such as heart diseases (ODonnell, 2008). Areas affected can be the social interaction that an individual has every day, the work environment and the balance between home and work paired with their efforts and rewards. It has been shown that people with better relationships with their family and friends and who engage in social activities have better prospects to a fitter lifestyle than those who are rather isolated (Campbell, 2010).The last model focuses on patterns of social, psychological and biological advantages and disadvantages that can occur during the lifetime of a person. Factors that can influence a persons life can arise as early as in-utero and in early childhood. These disadvantages can ultimately accumulate and worsenedn through childhood and adulthood (Steinbach, 2009 Bartley, 2004). For example, individuals who have experienced differences in autonomy or, on the other hand, shame and doubt in childhood will react differently throughout their adult life (Graham, 2009).These models are represented by catchment area studies in social class inequalities in health in the UK such as the Black Report (DHHS, 1980), the Whitehall study of British civil servants (spans over 10 years starting in 1967) and the Acheson report (Acheson, 1988).How gender affects health inequalitiesMany studies and researches have proven that, in industrialized countries such as the UK, women live longer than men only when present more preponderance to ill health (Scambler, 2008). Although men have a greater chance of mortality due to injury and suicide in earlier stages of adulthood coupled with common single causes of death in adulthood such as cardiovascular diseases and cancers, more women than men go through stages of disabilities, notably in older ages. Mental disabilities have mostly been commonly correlated to anxiety and depressive disorders (Steinbach, 2009 Bartley, 2004 Acheson, 1998).The World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2008 suggested that gender differences in health are a result of both biological factors and social factors such as employment, risk taking behaviour, smoking and alcohol (Campbell, 2010).How ethnicity affects health inequalitiesUnfortunately, the information on death certificates in the UK do not uncover ethnicity, and mortality data uses country of birth as a defining factor, therefore ethnical minorities born in the UK cannot be determined. But firm documented studies on ethnical inequalities in mortality (Kelly, 2008) have explained that factors such as, migration processes, defined socio-economic disadvantages and genetic and biological differences between ethnic populations account for differences in mortality.Inequalities in the handiness to health careThe access to health care is a supply concern which describes the quality and quantity of services provided to a person and are defined by the health care transcription itself. In the UK, the health care system is the National Health answer (NHS), a system that was founded on the principle of fairness, meaning people should get the care they quest, not the care they can afford (Steinbach, 2009 Cookson, 2016).The inverse care law, first described by Julian Tudor Hart in 1971, states The availability of good medical care tends to vary inversely with the need for it in the population served (Hart, 1971).Equality of access to health care can be achieved by communities by meeting sure requirements. Factors such as the distance travelled, the transport facilities and communication used, the hospital waiting times, the patient information and knowledge about available treatment and its effectiveness and the costs of all these are considered to convey to a health care system which is equal to all (Steinbach, 2009 Cookson, 2016).Availability is a determining factor of inequalities in handiness in health care. Some health care servi ces have been shown to treat population groups differently, denying services to some people and preferring others for a certain treatment. For example, clinicians might have a bias in treating different patients based on individual characteristics even though they have identical needs. The equality in the costs of health care can also be disrupted by imposing costs which differ between people. Or even the information given to different populations can impact the patients outcome. For example, health care organisations who neglect or fail to ensure that everyone is equally intended to the services available (Goddard and Smith, 2001).The NHS and current health inequality challengesThe NHS regularly comes top of international league tables of fairness in health care but it is not perfectly fair. There are inequalities in the volume, quality and outcomes of NHS care received by rich and poor people. These inequalities could get worse as financial austerities start to bite more severely into NHS budgets and may contribute to wider health inequalities in society. These inequalities raise serious concerns about social referee and unfulfilled potential for disadvantaged people to live longer and healthier lives. A research project lead by Richard Cookson in 2012 cogitate on monitoring fairness of the NHS to make sure inequalities dont get worse and if possible get better. In 2012, the NHS still didnt monitor how inequalities were changing. And NHS decision makers knew that inequalities existed, but they had no way of telling if inequalities were getting better or worse or what influence their decisions were having on inequalities. By monitoring the fairness of the NHS, the results will make sure that everyone, rich or poor, can receive the care they need to live a long and healthy life (Cookson, 2016).Recently, research projects have provided methods of comparing the performance of local NHS areas in tackling inequalities in health care. Alongside similar indicator s for wider determinants of health, such as the regularly updated marmot indicators (UCL, 2015). Which review the pick out areas that need to be improved to make a significant impact on health care inequalities such as strengthening the mathematical function and impact of ill health prevention. The methods will assess how well the NHS is tackling inequalities across a broad range of issues (Buck, 2016).An outcome from the Health equity Indicators for the position NHS Longitudinal whole-population study at small area level research project showed a great improvement in patient health care by monitoring key stages of the patient pathway (See Figure 2) (Cookson, 2016).Figure 2 Monitoring health care access, quality and outcomes at key stages of the pathway (Cookson, 2016).For example, Figure 3 shows that GP supply increased in all social groups, and the largest increases were in the most deprived areas. As seen below, the pro-rich inequality gradient was eliminated by 2011/2012 (As aira, 2016).Figure 3 Equity of elemental care supply, Patients per full time equivalent GP, excluding registrars and retainers, adjusted for age, sex and health deprivation (Asaira, 2016).ConclusionHealth care inequalities most commonly arise from socio-economic conditions and are shaped by political, social and economic forces that can cook or destroy a persons health and wellbeing. These problems are now seen as health problems that must be addressed to ensure everyone has an equal chance of a healthy life. Factors such as the costs of healthcare, social class, gender, ethnicity and accessibility to health care all contribute to the quality of life. Recently, projects have been undergone to serve improve healthcare in the UK, for example, by monitoring the fairness of its services. In my opinion, the UK is one of the leading health care services in the world despite existing inequalities, but can be improved by further understanding and improving these inequalities, who have be en only recently assessed. entireness word count 1966References-Acheson D (1998). Independent inquiry into inequalities in health report. London The Stationary Office.-Asaria M, Ali S, Doran T, ferguson B, Fleetcroft R, Goddard M, goldblatt P, Laudicella M, Raine R, Cookson R. (2016). How a universal health system reduces inequalities lessons from England. Epidemiology biotic community health. 0 (1), 1-7.-Baker M, Mawby R, Ware J (2015). Health Inequalities. Engalnd Royal college of general practitioners. 2-16.-Bartley M, Blane D (2008). Inequality and social class in Scambler G, Sociology as applied to medicine. Elsevier Limited.-Bartley M (2004). Health inequality an introduction to theories, concepts, and methods. Cambridge Polity Press.-Buck D (2016). The image of the NHS in reducing health inequalities moving beyond fair access to care. gettable https//www.kingsfund.org.uk/blog/2016/03/reducing-health-inequalities. Last accessed foremost Feb 2017.-Campbell F (2010). The soc ial determinants of health and the role of local government. England Investor in People. 5-68.-Cookson R (2016), Health Equity Indicators for the NHS, presented at maximizing the impact of the NHS in tackling health inequalities, London, 2016.-Cookson R (2016) Health equity indicators for the English final report to the NIHR HSDR Programme. HSDR-Cookson R, Propper C, Asaria M, raine R. (2016). Socio-Economic Inequalities in Health Care in England. The diary of applied public Economics. 37 (3-4), p371-403.-Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) (1980). Inequalities in health report of a research working group. (The Black Report). HMSO, London.-Graham H (2009). Understanding Health Inequalities. 2nd ed. England Open University Press. 1-20.-Goddard M, Smith P (2001). Equity of access to health care services theory and evidence from the UK. Social Science and Medicine 531149-62.-Hart T J. (1971). The inverse care law. The Lancet. 297 (7696), p405-412.-Kelly M, Nazroo J (2008). Ethnicity and Health in Scambler G Sociology as applied to medicine. Elsevier Limited.-Morning, Roberts, Phelan (2015), Social inequalities in health, presented at Social Inequalities in Health, Behavioral and Social Sciences Research rile Series, Bethesda, 2015.-ODonnell, K. Brydon, L. Wright, C. Steptoe, A. (2008). Self-esteem levels and cardiovascular and inflammatory responses to acute stress. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 22 (8) 1241-1247-Scambler A (2008). Women and Health in Scambler G Sociology as applied to medicine. Elsevier Limited. Steinbach R. (2009). Inequalities in the distribution of health and health care and its access, including inequalities relating to social class, gender, culture and ethnicity, and their causes. procurable http//www.healthknowledge.org.uk/public-health-textbook/medical-sociology-policy-economics/4c-equality-equity-policy/inequalities-distribution. Last accessed inaugural Feb 2017.-The National Institute for Health and Care Exellence. (Oct 2012). Health inequalities and population health. Available https//www.nice.org.uk/advice/lgb4/chapter/introduction. Last accessed 1st Feb 2017.-UCL Institute of Health Equity. (2015). Marmot Indicators 2015. Available http//www.instituteofhealthequity.org/projects/marmot-indicators-2015. Last accessed 1st Feb 2017.