Conflict in Short Story Essay

Essay on the Conflict Presented in William Faulkners perfectly Story, barn Burning Conflict in literary works drop be presented in a multitude of ways and it can be about almost everything that presents opposing forces. In William Faulkners short narration, Barn Burning, the conflict is indeed about two opposing forcesthat of the sustain and the password who values different things and who sees things differently. However, this is not the only conflict that the story illustrates. more than the physical conflict which the puzzle and the boy so obviously have, at that place is a hidden conflict present which is within the watchword.This conflict is the booking between what is right as defined by the law which the son upholds versus what is correct as defined by familial loyalty. The story revolves almost the case of the arrive, Mr. Snopes who is accused of burning the barn of Mr. Harris. Though the case is dismissed, the Snopes depict is forever t ainted and the family find outs to leave t receive and relocate. In the beginning of the story itself, Colonel Sartoris Snopes, the little boy protagonist and youngest son of Mr. Snopes is in turmoil since he kat onces that his father did indeed order that the barn of Mr. Harris be burned.Readers are fitting to see the conflict within the character of Sartoris who wants to say the truth only when who wants to be loyal to his father, a father who nurtured, sheltered, fed and comforted him. Sartoris decides that he will be loyal to his father even to the point of regarding Mr. Harris as their common enemy our enemy he thought in that discouragement ourn Mine and hisn both Hes my father (Faulkner, 1939, p. 1137). This parade of thoughts that Sartoris conjures up in his mind is the beginning of the battle of his conscience of whether he wants to set up by the loyalty that he owes his father and family or abide by societal laws.These thoughts are actually as well as a reflection of Sartoris win over h imself that he must at all cost, abide by familial loyalty. The same strain of thought pops again when the pass judgment in scud of the case calls on Sartoris to testify whether his father really had a mess in the burning of the barn He aims for me to lie, he thought, again with that agitated grief and despair. And I will have to do it. (Faulkner, 1939, 1138). Sartoris knows that his father is blamable and yet he also knows that he must lie to protect his father and the reputation of the rest of the family members, that he has no choice.Later on when the family leaves town to relocate, the father calls the son to ask him whether he would tell the judge the truth. This moment is where the father explains to the son what to do and what the importance of familial godliness and loyalty is You got to learn to stick to your own blood or you aint going to have any blood to stick to you (Faulkner, 1939, p. 1140). This account statement of the father sums up the conflict that they ha ve with each other the father thinks that even if a family member is wrong, the others have to stick to that wronged member slice the son thinks that truth and justice are more important.This difference in opinions, values and perspectives turn out to be crucial points in the decision when the father runs into trouble again and decides to burn another barn. The son lastly decides without hesitation that he will not stand up for his father and for the rest of the family who chose to stand with the father. The son decides to stop the father by duty the attention of the barn owner that there is something amiss. Thus, the son wins over the father twice in the sense that he chooses to abide by his own beliefs while at the same time upholding the laws of society and saving the station of the other.However, there is also a sense of loss of the boy since he has lost his family and he causes the death of his own father by coverage him to De Spain, the barn owner. In a way, the fathers e xplanation with the son comes true since the son did not stick to his blood, his blood will also not to stick to him meaning that his family (the rest of the Snopes) will also decide to leave him or be disloyal to him. In conclusion, the conflict in the story is between father and son and between the sons loyalties to his family versus his moral obligations to the laws of society.Both conflicts are also resolved by the last of Faulkners short story with the death of the father. However, there is a misfortune that a new conflict arises in the loneliness that the son is now going to experience as he makes his own way in the world and whether he can survive that loneliness. References Faulkner, W. (1939). Barn burning. The Harper American literature, v. 2, 2nd ed. Ed. McQuade, D. , et al. New York HarperCollinsPublishers Inc. pp. 1137-1149.